Skip to content

Month: February 2009

Anti-Defamation League Defames Me – My Letter to the ADL

I’ve discovered that the Anti-Defamation League, whose devotion to Israel-right-or-wrong many people feel is extremely destructive, has listed me first in those it has decided are “anti-Israel.”

In looking through their entry about me, I’ve noticed a number of distortions and inaccuracies; however, I generally don’t think it’s worthwhile to take time away from productive projects to respond to the many mistruths that abound about me on websites and blogs by various fanatic Israel devotees. Instead, I expect that people will read my writings for themselves and visit the If Americans Knew website to learn about me.

However, one section of the ADL entry is so blatantly defamatory that I’ve decided to demand that they correct it. The problem is that I can’t find any contact information on their site for emailing a letter; the only option seems to be a fill-in-the-blank system that restricts comments to 1,000 characters. Therefore, I’m using that option to direct them to read my letter here:

To the ADL:


I am aware that the ADL frequently considers reporting negative facts about Israel to be “anti-Semitic,” therefore, I am not surprised that your organization is displeased with my work to provide information about Israel-Palestine to the American public.

However, I would expect your writers to discuss what I write and say, not misrepresentations of these. In scanning your entry about me, I noticed that there seem to be a number of distortions and inaccuracies. While I will not bother to address most of these, I must demand that you correct the following particularly defamatory misrepresentations:

This entry claims, incorrectly, that my “…. criticism of Israel has, at times, crossed the line into anti-Semitism.” As alleged evidence of this, the writer misrepresents what I had written in a piece in the Greenwich Citizen entitled, “What Our Taxes to Israel are Funding,” an op-ed written in response to points raised by a previous column in the newspaper.

Your writer states that I had allegedly: “…hand-picked quotations from Jewish religious texts and used them erroneously to define and defame Judaism, which she described as “such a ruthless and supremacist faith.”

This is quite false:

 

1. I did not hand-pick quotations. I quoted from books by two renowned scholars of Judaism whose point, as I wrote in my article, was the significance to a portion of Israelis, particularly Israeli soldiers, of some little-known (in the US) religious texts. As I wrote in my article:

” ‘What makes such texts particularly significant,’ Shahak explains, is that ‘[i]n Israel these ideas are widely disseminated among the public at large, in the schools and in the army.’ In a booklet published by the Israeli Army for its soldiers, Shahak reports, the Chief Chaplain wrote:

” ‘When our forces come across civilians during a war or in hot pursuit or in a raid, so long as there is no certainty that those civilians are incapable of harming our forces, then according to the Halakhah they may and even should be killed … In war, when our forces storm the enemy, they are allowed and even enjoined by the Halakhah to kill even good civilians, that is, civilians who are ostensibly good.’

“One can only imagine what this kind of teaching means for Palestinians in Israel itself, and, still worse, for those in the West Bank who live next to settlements populated by heavily armed adherents of such a ruthless and supremacist faith…”


2. As can easily be seen, I am describing the extreme beliefs above as “ruthless and supremacist,” not Judaism, as the ADL entry claims.

3. I went on to specifically note that these extreme beliefs specifically do not, as your entry claims, “define Judaism”:

“While the above citations do not in anyway represent the whole of Judaism…”


4. I then went on to emphasize that these views are not representative of Jewish Americans:

“I have no doubt that the vast majority of Jewish Americans have long since repudiated these…”


5. I also specifically stated:

“…most Israelis also do not hold the beliefs touched upon above…”


6. Finally, I emphasized similarities among Jewish and non-Jewish Americans and urged moving forward together:

“… just as Christian and Muslim leaders have publicly condemned and disowned spurious dogmas and practices, I suspect it would be valuable for Rabbi Hurvitz and other Jewish leaders to do the same. Such shared honesty and humility by all our religious leaders, I believe, helps us move forward as a stronger, more moral, and more unified society.”


My entire article can be read at:
http://www.ifamericansknew.org/us_ints/pg-weiroped.html

I find it extremely difficult to comprehend how your writer could so seriously misconstrue my article, and cannot but feel that the intent was malicious. Please correct your defamatory and inaccurate statements and intimations immediately.

Sincerely,

Alison Weir
Executive Director
If Americans Knew
office: (202) 631-4060

Media misreport cease-fire violations, again

Killing Palestinians doesn’t count:
Is a ceasefire breached only when an Israeli is killed
?

[Poynter.org — http://groups.poynter.org/members/blog_view.asp?id=160568&post=56867] [Earlier Version published by CounterPunch, Jan. 29, 2009: http://counterpunch.org/weir01292009.html]

Killing Palestinians doesn’t count:
Is a ceasefire breached only when an Israeli is killed
?

On January 27th media headlines trumpeted that Palestinians had broken the latest cease-fire: a bomb had killed one Israeli soldier and injured two or three.

Virtually every media outlet reported this action as a major breach in the ceasefire that had begun on January 18th: Associated Press, CNN, Fox News, CBS, the New York Times, The Washington Post, the LA Times, the McClatchy Newspapers, etc, all pinned the resumption of violence on Palestinians.

There’s just one problem. Israeli forces had already violated the ceasefire at least seven times:

• Israeli forces killed a Palestinian farmer in Khuza’a east of Khan Yunis on Jan 18
• Israeli forces killed a Palestinian farmer east of Jabalia on Jan. 19
• Israeli naval gunboats shelled the Gaza coastline, causing damage to civilian structures
• Israeli troops shot and injured a child east of Gaza City on Jan 22
• Israeli gunboat fire injured 4-7 Palestinian fishermen on Jan 22
• Israeli shelling set a Palestinian house on fire on Jan 22
• Israeli tanks fired on the border town of Al Faraheen, causing damage to homes and farms on Jan 24

Yet, Americans who rely on American media for their news on Israel-Palestine are being led to believe that Palestinians initiated the violence (the death of one Israeli soldier) that has now led to Israel’s latest onslaught:

By the end of the day, according to reports, Israeli forces had already killed a 27-year-old Palestinian farmer by tank fire; had closed the crossings into Gaza, denying the entire population (1.5 million) access to desperately needed shipments of food, medicine, and other humanitarian aid; had launched a military drone that fired a missile into the city of Khan Yunis, injuring a Hamas member on a motorcycle and reportedly at least one Palestinian child nearby; had sent 20 tanks and seven military bulldozers into Gaza; and had occupied a Palestinian home near the town of Deir Al Balah.*

This is not the first time that the press has reversed the chronology
of Israeli-Palestinian violence.


While the media widely reported that Israel’s three-week-long massacre of Palestinians begun on Dec. 27th was a reaction to Palestinian rockets, the fact is that Israel had initiated the violence by breaking the truce on Nov. 4th by killing six Palestinians and injuring another six, and on Nov. 5th by killing yet another Palestinian. Only after this Israeli violence (and its continued suffocating closure of Gaza, another extremely significant truce violation) did Hamas rocket fire resume.

Most Palestinian rockets are homemade projectiles constructed of scrap metal. They began to be launched only after Israeli invasions of Gaza and the West Bank had killed and injured hundreds of civilians.

In six years, these rockets have killed a total of 18 Israelis. Israel killed at least 40 Palestinian men, women, and children in a few minutes on Jan. 6th who had sought refuge at a UN school. During its Dec-Jan invasion Israeli forces killed over 1,300 Gazan men, women, and children and injured over 5,000; Palestinian resistance fighters killed 9 Israelis (4 additional deaths were caused by friendly fire), 5 of them soldiers.**

Three researchers, Nancy Kanwisher, Johannes Haushofer, & Anat Biletzki, recently investigated the sequence of ceasefire violations thoroughly and published a detailed analysis of which party — Israelis or Palestinians — broke truces, ceasefires, & periods of calm first. Their findings, published on the Hufftington Post, are clear:

“Virtually all periods of nonviolence lasting more than a week were ended when the Israelis killed Palestinians first. We include here the data from all pause durations that actually occurred.

“Thus, a systematic pattern does exist: it is overwhelmingly Israel, not Palestine, that kills first following a lull. Indeed, it is virtually always Israel that kills first after a lull lasting more than a week.***

It’s time that the press begins reporting this correctly. The American public — and peace — are ill-served by misreporting the facts.

___

** http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/dec08.html

*** To see the full report, including data and charts, go to http://www.ifamericansknew.org/cur_sit/reigniting.html

#